It could have been a humour piece like, 'Bob likes to draw booty this way, Jeff likes this kind' or a 'How well do you know your artists style'piece. Maybe. But in execution it's all fanservice. :/
I disagree with the article about the Wizard articleon the point of 'possesivness'. I think that's pointless nitpicking and reaching. Considering how many different artists have drawn characters like Superman, Wonder Woman, She Hulk officially and how blurred some of the creator credits are, it seems appropriate to designate a redition as “Steve McNiven’s Dagger”. “Bob Something's Dagger drawn by Steve McNiven" is more complete but so very much editor chopping block material for wasted space. Now Bob's the possesor too :/ and it's not like the artists are at fault for being credited that way.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2006-10-28 07:05 pm (UTC)I disagree with the article about the Wizard articleon the point of 'possesivness'. I think that's pointless nitpicking and reaching. Considering how many different artists have drawn characters like Superman, Wonder Woman, She Hulk officially and how blurred some of the creator credits are, it seems appropriate to designate a redition as “Steve McNiven’s Dagger”. “Bob Something's Dagger drawn by Steve McNiven" is more complete but so very much editor chopping block material for wasted space. Now Bob's the possesor too :/ and it's not like the artists are at fault for being credited that way.
just my opinion