Just a Girl Living in Captivity
Oct. 27th, 2006 12:40 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Johanna over at Comics Worth Reading has a report of Wizard magazine's newest low point. To whit, it's a "game" where you identify which artist drew which female character's booty. Uh, hello? Comics industry? What the fuck?!
Now, I will be honest here, I love looking at shapely ladies. I like watching them on TV and in movies, I like classic pinups, I have a big collection of Bettie Page merch, and I am all about girls with curvy derrieres. But when girls are reduced to NOTHING BUT THEIR PARTS, my feminist ire gets riled. And boy, am I ever riled now. I am even more riled to discover that a previous issue had a similar "game" where you identified female heroines by their breasts alone! Golly!
I am so glad I haven't read an issue of Wizard in years. Yuck.
Now, I will be honest here, I love looking at shapely ladies. I like watching them on TV and in movies, I like classic pinups, I have a big collection of Bettie Page merch, and I am all about girls with curvy derrieres. But when girls are reduced to NOTHING BUT THEIR PARTS, my feminist ire gets riled. And boy, am I ever riled now. I am even more riled to discover that a previous issue had a similar "game" where you identified female heroines by their breasts alone! Golly!
I am so glad I haven't read an issue of Wizard in years. Yuck.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-27 05:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-27 06:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-27 06:22 pm (UTC)Me too. I hate the whole overcompensating "we are dorks but we are MEN" shit.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-27 06:33 pm (UTC)=^,,^-
no subject
Date: 2006-10-27 08:11 pm (UTC)*hides*
no subject
Date: 2006-10-28 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-28 04:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-27 06:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-27 06:54 pm (UTC)And some people wonder why comics is still predominantly (but slowly changing) a boy's club.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-27 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-27 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-27 08:35 pm (UTC)The other thing I notice is the typeface is just like the one used in Entertainment Weekly. Maxim and Entertainment Weekly, that's setting the bar pretty low. Before I saw this, I could rebut anyone who would look down their nose at me for reading comics by saying, "Yeah, well you read Entertainment Weekly."
no subject
Date: 2006-10-27 09:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-27 10:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-27 10:23 pm (UTC)http://ratcreature.livejournal.com/175099.html?thread=696315
(Joke for Phil: What are you carrying? Garlic!)
no subject
Date: 2006-10-28 12:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-28 01:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-28 02:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-28 03:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-28 11:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-28 12:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-28 07:05 pm (UTC)I disagree with the article about the Wizard articleon the point of 'possesivness'. I think that's pointless nitpicking and reaching. Considering how many different artists have drawn characters like Superman, Wonder Woman, She Hulk officially and how blurred some of the creator credits are, it seems appropriate to designate a redition as “Steve McNiven’s Dagger”. “Bob Something's Dagger drawn by Steve McNiven" is more complete but so very much editor chopping block material for wasted space. Now Bob's the possesor too :/ and it's not like the artists are at fault for being credited that way.
just my opinion
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 09:11 pm (UTC)<>